Home Archive Tags Diary Exhibitions
|
Clara Mae Gregory
|
When were traveling and going to the music festivals, we met a very young man-- Billy Strings.
We knew then he was destined to do great things in the musical world-- and he has!
More Music: Billy Strings
Written 2026-06-21Turmoil and Tinfoil
https://youtu.be/1ihPCxgRTgE?is=U9eEylzMnQrmsaFX
China Cat Sunflower
https://www.youtube.com/live/_-QzLlvIl2M?is=4ZRHK6KJHVxOs7Di
Dear Mr. Fantasy
https://www.youtube.com/live/WN1R0vuOLjA?is=yADiu-x24-tlnkeE
Red Rocking Chair
https://youtu.be/aR3iXp5Qnh4?is=qVQSTg76SM66oYXU
Shady Grove
https://youtu.be/AGScvVTHqQo?is=UBGR9bUGvVUrmX6M
Join Together; Franklin's Tower [AWESOME!]
https://www.youtube.com/live/b4NZkG9FXx8?is=6iEyO_G-7fSJSSBd
Little Maggie
https://youtu.be/CBPjv6iN5PM?is=1ULn9KV3KE95yqgN
Thirst Mutilator
https://youtu.be/pwscYemcbRs?is=khjFM5sr9TRxjibK
Heartbeat of America
https://youtu.be/Bc_ZUK3orrA?is=A6WnanLry7wz7IqO
Wargasm
https://youtu.be/SI5kiC8fP30?is=JuaXKJA-dEEBpv6Z
War Pig [tribute to Ozzy]
https://youtu.be/rwH5ACiN6fY?is=A9abIvB_6QH0HarP
Save as a bookmark (requires login) Write a comment (requires login) Send as email Print text
a selection of different musical artists starting with Wade's music and art visuals
Music musing
Written 2026-06-20Lil Wobbly Wade
https://youtu.be/bOJRoRF0nkQ?is=Z7FdvVlDFTnuzsuV
Trey Anastasio and Billy Strings
"Guild The Lily"
https://youtu.be/cJPhImUvnK4?is=ZcoTrk9fkMg4Oj3p
Comatose Brothers. "Wicked"
https://youtu.be/SIaIP3EROJY?is=a7AgJPkvzvZ8EvPG
Robin Trower
"Bridge of Sighs"
https://youtu.be/FLyESW7_lm4?is=1-mldaBwKxpNt2lY
Foggy Mountain Spaceship
"Walking on The Moon"
https://youtu.be/w4iJH7rP_a8?is=v5WsH73DpFk2jXBf
Ricky Skaggs and Ashley Monroe
"Old Enough"
https://youtu.be/RTUUutXanLM?is=mF9v3U_tAW86zwl8
Doc Watson
"Tennessee Stud"
https://youtu.be/KogJRiQ-O-k?is=oCF3v1QgIoPGnWKx
The String Cheese Incident
"Sympathy For The Devil" Red Rocks, Colorado
https://youtu.be/Moz3P2Z1gvw?is=8BhYvwjY-ODTONAl
Save as a bookmark (requires login) Write a comment (requires login) Send as email Print textWe've been to "Mystery Mountain"archeological sites 3 separate times. We did much more exploring than just traveling to experience the music festivals worlds along the way, places like Red Rocks & Placerville.
Deep diving into mystery history.....
Written 2026-06-19places like Red Rocks & Placerville....gold rush and more chasing the gold from an accurate, historical perspective. The wilderness in the wild west wasn't always a dry desert.
Our new guy we have been following: [good stuff]
https://youtu.be/kcu9s30rTLk?is=N7TivPvfDqeijhOu
Concerning "Mystery" aka "Hidden Mountain" , this man's presentation is informative and interesting.....
https://youtu.be/E3tMagitrvY?is=fVfvZ5h33VHdb_ae
There's another archeological astronomical petraglyph discovered and eventually damaged:
AI Overview The astronomical petroglyph associated with the Los Lunas Decalogue Stone is a sky-map or "calendar stone" located higher up the slopes of Hidden Mountain.While the famous 80-ton basalt boulder near the mountain's base is carved with a Paleo-Hebrew version of the Ten Commandments, researchers and independent investigators have documented an additional carved panel further up the mountain.The Petroglyph: The upper rock displays a carved sky-map that depicts various constellations, including the signs of the zodiac, the constellation Scorpio, and an image believed to represent a partial solar eclipse.Astronomical Alignment: Researchers who studied the carving have suggested that the layout aligns with specific celestial events. Specifically, calculations from these sky maps point to a nearly total solar eclipse that was visible over New Mexico in the year 107 B.C..Controversy: The dating and authenticity of the Decalogue Stone and its associated astronomical petroglyphs are heavily debated. While some fringe theorists argue these carvings are proof of ancient, pre-Columbian voyages, the mainstream archaeological community generally considers them to be hoaxes or more modern creations. Los Lunas Decalogue Stone - WikipediaDecalogue Stone in situ in 1997. The Los Lunas Decalogue Stone is a hoax associated with a lar...WikipediaA Visit to the Decalogue Stone at Hidden MountainJan 10, 2011 — There is another stone higher up the mountain that has constellations carved on it. These carvings show many of the signs of the z...oneClimbs.comLos Lunas Decalogue Stone and Commandments RockCentral. About. Channel your inner Indiana Jones and visit Mystery Stone, located on State Trust Lands at the base of Hidden Mount...New Mexico Tourism
The Los Lunas Stone has not been proven to be a hoax. Some of the known history surrounding it is disputable, however and oral traditional proof is inadequate as a confirmation for its authenticy.
The origins of the stone are intensely debated in the archaeological community: Guess what? These types of intellectual debates are nothing new under the sun.
And historical, similar debates were proven wrong.
Wrong or right.....this one is intriguing and personally I BELIEVE IT BECAUSE OF THE ASTRONOMICAL PETROGLYPH THAT WAS ALSO DISCOVERED.
Because the site is located on New Mexico State Trust Land [Indian Reservation], you must obtain a permit to legally visit and hike to the boulder.
The Controversy: Genuine vs. HoaxArchaeologists and epigraphers hold mixed opinions regarding the authenticity of the astronomical sky map and the Decalogue Stone.Proponents: Some scholars and organizations (like the Epigraphic Society) argue the script and astronomical mapping are physical evidence of Pre-Columbian contact in the Americas by ancient Semitic or Phoenician travelers.Skeptics: Mainstream archaeologists argue the artifacts are an elaborate 20th-century hoax. Some oral traditions suggest the Decalogue Stone was carved by students of archaeologist Frank Hibben in 1930 as a prank. Critics point to a lack of authentic patination (natural rock weathering), the use of specific vowel markers, and word spacing atypical of ancient Hebrew.You can view the site on State Trust Lands, though the rock panels were unfortunately vandalized in 2006.
The Decalogue inscription is located at the foot of the Hidden Mountains on the north-eastern side, at the only accessible pathway going
up. However, there are other artifacts of interest, too. When James D. Tabor did his survey of the whole site in 1996 he reported the
existence of some leftovers of an ancient habitation (see 8). There was an ancient fortification, he claims, and not
immediately visible from the ground to the untrained eye. However, the whole site, especially the top and the north-eastern rocks and
slopes, are covered with petroglyphs.
The researcher David Deal published a detailed analysis for one of these petroglyphs (3) . It depicts a sky-map, laid out on a flat rock,
recording the positions of the planets and constellations during a solar eclipse. It coincides with the solar eclipse on September 15, 107
B.C.E., to be followed by the Jewish "Rosh Ha Shannah" on the next day. This interesting discovery was first published by David Deal
back in 1984. "Rosh Ha Shanah" is the first day of the Jewish month of "Tishri". "Ethanim" was the old-Hebrew name for "Tishri" referring
to the seventh lunar month of the sacred calendar of the Israelites. It was also regarded as the first month of their secular calendar,
especially in an agricultural sense. Like David Deal, James D. Tabor, too, emphasizes the significance between the date of the Los Lunas
solar eclipse on September 15 107 B.C.E. and the Jewish New Year. However, he thinks both events were on the same day (8).
Another interesting petroglyph discovered, seems to be a portrait of an ancient high-ranking
mediterranean visitor, possibly wearing a crown. Crowns were unknown to native American Indians. They are of Middle Eastern or
Mediterranean origin. There is a small cross-like symbol in the circle, an artistic representation of the old-Hebrew or Phoenician
letter TETH. This might be just a coincidence, but should be taken into consideration in view of the other Hebrew or Phoenician artifacts
on that same site.
https://www.ronpaulcurriculum.com/LosLunasDating.pdf
Save as a bookmark (requires login) Write a comment (requires login) Send as email Print textTell it Kimbery Blake. Maybe someone will hear and change their direction.
The Truth Some Ears Don't Want To Hear
Written 2026-06-18BLESS YOU KIMBERLY- Sister, you are speaking Truth
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1E2fcQioYZ/
All these things blow my mind. This level of hate is not comprehensible.
I feel the need to be wary at all times-
an emotion I never had my entire life until now, in these times.
Save as a bookmark (requires login) Write a comment (requires login) Send as email Print text
CAROLINA HURRICANES Stanley Cup Winners
Written 2026-06-16 Save as a bookmark (requires login) Write a comment (requires login) Send as email Print textWhen in doubt, check it out.
Copyright and AI
Written 2026-06-15Under U.S. copyright law, works generated entirely by Artificial Intelligence are not copyright-exempt—they are not eligible for copyright protection at all.The legal realities of AI and copyright depend on whether you are talking about the outputs generated by AI or the sources used to train AI models:
1.
AI-Generated Outputs (What you create)Human Authorship Requirement: The U.S. Copyright Office mandates that copyright protection only applies to works created by human authors. Content produced solely by a machine with no significant human creative input cannot be copyrighted and essentially falls into the public domain.
Mixed Works: If you use AI to generate a rough draft or base image, but add substantial human creative input—such as complex human-authored edits, arrangements, or combinations with human-made material—those specific human-contributed elements can be copyrighted.
Liability: If the output generated by the AI tool infringes on an existing copyright, the business or individual utilizing the tool can be held legally liable.
2.
AI Training Sources (What the AI uses)
Fair Use Debate: Tech companies argue that using copyrighted works as data to train AI models falls under "fair use" (similar to how a search engine indexes pages).
Ongoing Litigation: Many human creators and publishers dispute this, arguing that ingesting millions of copyrighted works without permission or compensation is an infringement. The legality of this practice is currently being decided in various courts. Those using AI tools to create business materials, blog posts, or creative works, should understand that this legal landscape is critical. AI can help you check if in doubt. Provide the AI assistant with the information in question such as specific type of content you are producing (e.g., text, code, images) and what tools you are using can provide more tailored guidance or help identify what requires additional human editing to protect your rights.
https://www.copyright.gov/ai/
Save as a bookmark (requires login) Write a comment (requires login) Send as email Print textI think I prefer legitimate news instead of some peep's wag-the-dog rants, distractive to the real issues plaguing society, especially American Society, rampant in today's world
Breaking News
Written 2026-06-15[Source AI Overview News]
The United States and Iran have reached a peace deal to end their recent conflict, brokered by Pakistan. The initial memorandum of understanding outlines a mutual end to military hostilities, a 60-day window for further nuclear negotiations, and reciprocal steps on sanctions and waterways.
▪︎CNBC
Core Terms of the Agreement:
Strait of Hormuz: The United States agreed to end its naval blockade, and Iran has committed to immediately reopen the vital waterway to commercial shipping.
▪︎NewsNation
Frozen Assets: The U.S. will release $25 billion in restricted Iranian assets, contingent upon the progression of the technical nuclear negotiations.
▪︎The Hill
Nuclear Program: Iran has committed indefinitely to neither produce nor acquire nuclear weapons, and both sides are to maintain the nuclear status quo while negotiating a final, dismantlement-focused agreement.
▪︎Reuters
Sanctions Relief: The U.S. agreed to refrain from imposing new sanctions and to issue Treasury Department waivers permitting the export of Iranian crude oil and petrochemicals.
▪︎The Hill
Hostilities: A full ceasefire is being implemented, terminating military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.
▪︎CNBC
Full text and official sign-offs are slated for an upcoming ceremony in Switzerland. Details on the agreement and the ongoing negotiations can be tracked via CNBC and Reuters.
As for the ludicrous and idiotic chicken little sky -is-falling rants puked by propagandists that convince ignorant peeps to believe Trump is a madman about to doom the world with nuclear war-- get a life and stop believing all the propaganda crap you choose to fill your insignificant pea brains with.
Donald Trump has frequently stated that nuclear weapons should "never be allowed to be used by anybody".
Trump's Statements and Public Positions:
Conflict Context: Addressing a question regarding the war with Iran, Trump stated that there is no need to resort to nuclear capabilities because the U.S. has conventionally "decimated" adversaries. He reiterated that nuclear weapons should "never be used by anyone".
Global Stance: During discussions regarding conflicts like the Iran war, he asserted that he would not use a nuclear bomb and questioned why anyone would. He has also previously argued that if such weapons are deployed, "the world might literally come to an end".
Official Military Doctrine: Despite his public rhetoric, official U.S. nuclear posture has historically stopped short of a strict, unilateral "no-first-use" policy. Previous reviews have maintained ambiguity, keeping the threat of a nuclear response on the table in extreme circumstances to protect U.S. and allied interests.
Tracking and Verification:To see how these positions compare to historical and current U.S. strategic doctrines, review the Union of Concerned Scientists for a breakdown of historical first-strike policies, or visit the Council on Foreign Relations for details on launch authority and global nuclear taboos.
The Trump administration officially rejects a "no first use" pledge and maintains a policy of deliberate ambiguity, as have all past administrations. The doctrine explicitly leaves open the option for nuclear use to deter and respond to extreme, non-nuclear strategic threats, including massive cyberattacks or biological and chemical warfare.The administration's stance and nuclear policy framework are defined by several key elements:
Strategic Ambiguity: The U.S. intentionally maintains a flexible first-use policy. By not ruling out first use, the doctrine forces adversaries to account for the possibility of a nuclear response, even when initiating non-nuclear, conventional, or asymmetric aggression.
Expanded Definition of Extreme Circumstances: The administration's foundational nuclear policy—rooted in the foundational Nuclear Posture Review—states that nuclear weapons are required to deter not only nuclear threats, but also a range of "significant non-nuclear strategic attacks".
Rejection of Sole Purpose or No First Use: The administration firmly declines to adopt a "sole purpose" doctrine (which restricts nuclear weapons solely to deterring nuclear attacks), arguing that this would weaken the deterrent value of the nuclear umbrella and potentially embolden adversaries. For a detailed analysis of the administration's strategic goals, review the Arms Control Association policy analysis or read the full War on the Rocks overview on declaratory policy.
ALL OF THE PAST administrations HELD THIS SAME POLICY.
U.S. administrations historically reject a "no first use" (NFU) pledge to maintain "calculated ambiguity," an approach also known as strategic ambiguity. This declaratory policy deliberately avoids specifying the exact conditions under which the U.S. might employ nuclear weapons.
Key Reasons for Deliberate Ambiguity:
Enhanced Deterrence: By refusing to rule out nuclear first use, the U.S. complicates an adversary's decision-making calculus. Foes must factor in the catastrophic risk of a nuclear response even in a non-nuclear, conventional conflict.
Allied Assurance: A "no first use" pledge could erode the confidence of U.S. allies. The extended nuclear deterrence umbrella is viewed by many partner nations as crucial for their security against conventional or non-nuclear strategic threats.
Strategic Flexibility: Calculated ambiguity preserves presidential options and flexibility during crises and conflicts, ensuring the U.S. does not unintentionally signal that conventional aggression comes without ultimate risks.Throughout successive National Posture Reviews, including those from the Obama, Trump, and Biden administrations, the U.S. has maintained that it will only consider the employment of nuclear weapons in "extreme circumstances" to defend the vital interests of the U.S. and its allies. For further reading on official U.S. nuclear posture, consult the Congressional Research Service report on extended deterrence. No-First Use of Nuclear Weapons: A Policy Assessment - IDADec 22, 2020 — * Introduction. As a matter of national policy for over fifty years, the United States has maintained calculated ambiguity as to t...Institute for Defense Analyses | IDAFull article: The Trump Administration’s Nuclear Posture ReviewOct 19, 2018 — The issue was debated in academic circles, allies expressed their views, and the National Security Council also discussed the argu...Taylor & Francis OnlineDangers of a Nuclear No First Use PolicyApr 1, 2019 — In the many decades that U.S. nuclear forces have deterred adversaries and assured allies and partners, the U.S. has never adopted...U.S. Department of War (.gov)
To the idiots out there suffering from politically charged delusional fabrications, the lies created by your own mind's making: These are the facts.Your "facts" are not facts-- just TDS rants from those that are proving to be mentally unstable with reality.
But based on past behaviors, it is not hard to predict what can go wrong. What may go wrong? The rogue, dark forces may try to circumvent this peace resolution and productive negotiation by using some form of sneaky sabotage and Israel would likely retaliate. They can't afford the cost of relunctancy by not responding. Nor do they want to be the aggressor, either. The sane people on both sides want this hateful, crazy fanaticism stopped. The most obvious way would be to end the supply of missiles and any other weapons of war.
A fantasy easier said than done when money and power are entwined.
Learn to love. Any differences, right or wrong should never lead to resolutions paid in bloodshed.
Evil is evil and it does not play fair, nor does it fight fair.
It plays a dirty game using the foolish pawns at their regime's disposal. Our lives do not matter to them and have never mattered to these evil schemers from both sides.
Sponsored terrorism is a serious problem relative to the immediate conflict occurring with Iran.
Deep inside southern Lebanon, the IDF continues uncovering Hezbollah tunnels filled with equipment, weapons, maps, and plans for attacks against Israeli communities.
As questions remain about Iran and the future of the conflict, fighting against Hezbollah continues on Israel’s northern border. It's very convoluted and complicated.
#Israel #Hezbollah #Lebanon #BreakingNews #MiddleEast
Save as a bookmark (requires login) Write a comment (requires login) Send as email Print text